Dr. AIX

Mark Waldrep, aka Dr. AIX, has been producing and engineering music for over 40 years. He learned electronics as a teenager from his HAM radio father while learning to play the guitar. Mark received the first doctorate in music composition from UCLA in 1986 for a "binaural" electronic music composition. Other advanced degrees include an MS in computer science, an MFA/MA in music, BM in music and a BA in art. As an engineer and producer, Mark has worked on projects for the Rolling Stones, 311, Tool, KISS, Blink 182, Blues Traveler, Britney Spears, the San Francisco Symphony, The Dover Quartet, Willie Nelson, Paul Williams, The Allman Brothers, Bad Company and many more. Dr. Waldrep has been an innovator when it comes to multimedia and music. He created the first enhanced CDs in the 90s, the first DVD-Videos released in the U.S., the first web-connected DVD, the first DVD-Audio title, the first music Blu-ray disc and the first 3D Music Album. Additionally, he launched the first High Definition Music Download site in 2007 called iTrax.com. A frequency speaker at audio events, author of numerous articles, Dr. Waldrep is currently writing a book on the production and reproduction of high-end music called, "High-End Audio: A Practical Guide to Production and Playback". The book should be completed in the fall of 2013.

10 thoughts on “The MQA Messaging: Questions

  • May 29, 2015 at 9:09 am
    Permalink

    How much REAL-HD ablums are currently available? Answer: Not a lot. Why??? Answer: The big labels are not interested in creating something new and want to make money the easy way but just re-releasing old stuff in newer shinier formats: LPCM, DSD, DXD, BLU-RAY AUDIO, SACD, DVD-A, super hires mp3, etc,etc.

    There are probably only about 5 small labels actually doing Hi-Res.. (I’m guessing here). Aix is probably the only one with a decent size catalog.
    So Mr. Waldrep, my question for you is, How much time are you spending cranking out REAL-HD albums?
    For the rest of 2015, how many more releases can we expect from AIX? What about 2016?

    Reply
    • May 30, 2015 at 7:41 am
      Permalink

      Not very many…my estimate is around 2000. AIX has around 100 titles, 2L has many more, Harmonia Mundi, MA, Telar etc. Unfortunately, it’s very expensive to create new projects complete with high-resolution video, which I produce in addition to the high-resolution audio tracks. I’m trying to get a few new ones out this year and maybe a few next year. But it is difficult.

      Reply
  • May 29, 2015 at 10:04 am
    Permalink

    Hi Mark, I have two questions, and you may have answered these at some previous time. I’ve only been reading your newsletter for a month or so. I find it very informative.

    1 – Will you need a dac that decodes MQA to get its benefits?

    2 – You have been talking about upsampling in the studio. There are a number of dacs on the market that offer the option or automatically upsample CDs, files, to 24/192, is there any audible benefit to those that do? From reading you, I gather there will not be any expanded data, but does it subjectively improve the sound?

    Thanks for all the knowledge you share.
    Jeff

    Reply
    • May 30, 2015 at 7:42 am
      Permalink

      Yes, the MQA algorithm will have to be part of the DAC or digital signal path.

      Upsampling makes the filtering easier and better…but it does not improve the fidelity in any meaningful way.

      Reply
  • May 29, 2015 at 11:10 am
    Permalink

    If your keynote includes telling the truth the MQA doesn’t improve sound quality as allthe golden ears are reporting, better bring your sword fighting shield. Their gonna try to stone you.

    Reply
    • May 30, 2015 at 7:43 am
      Permalink

      I did share my thoughts on MQA. Read today’s post for a full report.

      Reply
  • May 29, 2015 at 11:16 am
    Permalink

    Thank you Mark for the open-minded explanation of current studio practice relative to MQA. As for the 24/48 standard, most newer films are 24/96, and I would think that some studios use that rate while others use 24/48. Since they decimate just fine, no sweat.

    Clearly, we are not at a standardized point yet. Wouldn’t it be nice if it was a 24/96 world? And I’ve always wondered why 176.4 was not the target as it decimates with CD. 48khz was originally the DAT sampling frequency, if I remember correctly.

    I do appreciate your acknowledgement of the Pono player as sounding excellent. Again, it transports John Atkinson and he is a fairly audio-critical gent to say the least. He took the opportunity to strongly re-state in print this month his conclusion that the Pono is sonically special, and a very good value compared to such as A&K. Maybe the small display is Neil Young’s way of reminding us that staring at tiny tv screens is not part of the listening experience, and prevents attaining the maximum rewards .Thank You.

    Reply
    • May 30, 2015 at 7:47 am
      Permalink

      I used to be a production sound mixer (in addition to the stint as a mastering engineer) and I have a former student that runs a location sound business. The standard for film production is 48 kHz/24-bit PCM. The post production process my include 96 kH/24-bit output but the fidelity doesn’t take advantage of the higher specs.

      If thing settled on 96 kHz/24-bit PCM, I’d be happy but audiophile companies would keep claiming that higher is better.

      The Pono is a very nice digital playback device as far as portable players go…it can’t and doesn’t compete with a nice home rig.

      Reply
      • May 30, 2015 at 4:45 pm
        Permalink

        …but you can’t go running on the beach with your Benchmark…

        Reply
        • May 31, 2015 at 7:44 am
          Permalink

          Actually, right now I can’t go running at all. Somehow my left knee is a little swollen…it’s always something.

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

9 − 7 =