Dr. AIX

Mark Waldrep, aka Dr. AIX, has been producing and engineering music for over 40 years. He learned electronics as a teenager from his HAM radio father while learning to play the guitar. Mark received the first doctorate in music composition from UCLA in 1986 for a "binaural" electronic music composition. Other advanced degrees include an MS in computer science, an MFA/MA in music, BM in music and a BA in art. As an engineer and producer, Mark has worked on projects for the Rolling Stones, 311, Tool, KISS, Blink 182, Blues Traveler, Britney Spears, the San Francisco Symphony, The Dover Quartet, Willie Nelson, Paul Williams, The Allman Brothers, Bad Company and many more. Dr. Waldrep has been an innovator when it comes to multimedia and music. He created the first enhanced CDs in the 90s, the first DVD-Videos released in the U.S., the first web-connected DVD, the first DVD-Audio title, the first music Blu-ray disc and the first 3D Music Album. Additionally, he launched the first High Definition Music Download site in 2007 called iTrax.com. A frequency speaker at audio events, author of numerous articles, Dr. Waldrep is currently writing a book on the production and reproduction of high-end music called, "High-End Audio: A Practical Guide to Production and Playback". The book should be completed in the fall of 2013.

24 thoughts on “The Beatles on Vinyl LPs in Mono

  • September 21, 2014 at 9:35 am
    Permalink

    In addidition to the Urtext approved mono I would love to hear new stereo mixes from ’65 onward too. The Yellow Submarine Original Soundtrack release circa ’99 featured some awesome new stereo mixes…and yes, surround mixes would be nice too.

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 11:41 am
      Permalink

      I remember the “Yellow Submarine” too. It was simply magic.

      Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    For all of the Beatles albums in surround,”That would be something that I would invest in”.

    Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 9:58 am
    Permalink

    Would a surround mix of these albums be possible at all?
    I thought many of the recordings were ‘done’ with very few tracks/channels.

    After all the ‘Love’ project was for a specific purpose – and not meant to ‘reproduce’ the albums of the Beatles with ‘the possibilities of today’.

    I’d love to hear these LP’s .
    But I would not invest in them either.
    If a 96/2 version was avaible, I would certainly concider it – even if they are mono.

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 11:44 am
      Permalink

      No, they wouldn’t be due to the way the tracking was done back in the early 60s. Although, I believe it’s possible. I just happen to have a 48 kHz/24-bit copy of the Sgt. Peppers 4-track multitracks and this morning I decided to invest a few hours and play around in search of 5.1 surround mix of the opening tune. After a few hours, I’m convinced that it’s doable and the results would be compelling. I had a lot of fun playing with various things. If I get it to a place that’s worth sharing, I’ll think about posting a small chunk on the FTP site.

      Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 10:14 am
    Permalink

    I gave up many years ago trying to keep track of all The Beatles’ releases, but isn’t this vinyl version based on the 2009 remastering effort? At least, that’s what I gathered from http://variety.com/2014/music/news/the-business-of-the-beatles-continues-to-grow-1201073393/.

    But as you state, clarity on how transfers from the original tapes were done and processed for the vinyl release, and how that compares to the same for the 2009 CD release, would be nice to know.

    I listened to the mono and stereo 2009 CD versions fairly carefully when they came out, and I preferred the stereo versions sonically, so I only kept those.

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 11:53 am
      Permalink

      Interesting article but I’m not sure exactly sure whether the transfers of the master were redone for the mono vinyl versions. I haven’t followed it that closely.

      Reply
      • September 23, 2014 at 3:50 pm
        Permalink

        I recall reading somewhere that the 2009 Mono CD’s were from the Analog Masters with no tinkering like they did on the stereo CD’s. Can someone confirm that?

        Reply
        • September 24, 2014 at 8:27 am
          Permalink

          I can confirm I heard the same, but can’t confirm if it’s accurate :). I can confirm the stereo mixes sound different than the stereo mixes released before 2009, and I prefer the 2009 stereo mixes over all previous stereo releases.

          Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 10:55 am
    Permalink

    I’ve read elsewhere and from interviews with Giles/Sean that the catalog has been digitized at 24/192, but in my opinion, a lot of the stereo mixes are just plain bad. I’m hearing things on this mono vinyl that I’ve never heard before. I vote for a 24/192 mono transfer and a stereo/surround remix of the entire catalog.

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 11:54 am
      Permalink

      Thanks, that’s really good to hear.

      Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 1:57 pm
    Permalink

    Quick question. You consistently tell us why 192khz is pointless in recording then why use it when transferring tape?

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 2:28 pm
      Permalink

      If I had the opportunity to transfer the original master of any analog tape, I would use 192 kHz/24-bits too. It’s just a safety margin thing and lower noise floor.

      Reply
  • September 21, 2014 at 7:36 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Mark, boy, I’m with you. I would dearly love to hear The Beatles albums in surround.
    I read an article where Giles Martin claims to have transferred every take of every track to digital 24/192.
    The brief introduction to the Beatles in surround (Love) allowes us to hear “into” the tracks. No one has listened to The Beatles more than I and I have to say that I heard things in those tracks for the first time. Fabulous.

    Reply
    • September 21, 2014 at 11:54 pm
      Permalink

      I forgot to add that the mono box set sells here in Australia for $595.00. Each single album at $45.00.
      Repeat….mono. Ridiculous!

      Reply
      • September 22, 2014 at 7:35 am
        Permalink

        Rich collectors only. Sorry but this just doesn’t cut it. Give me the 192 kHz/24-bit files instead.

        Reply
    • September 26, 2014 at 5:18 pm
      Permalink

      AUD424 delivered to Melbourne from Amazon.com vs $580 at JB HiFi. Definite vinyl price gouging has emerged in the last 18 months here. They’ve gotta put food on the table I spose but Oh WOW!!

      Reply
    • September 22, 2014 at 7:36 am
      Permalink

      Thanks for the link. I’ll take a look.

      Reply
  • September 23, 2014 at 2:48 pm
    Permalink

    I am quite sure you also know Ian Shepherd and his quest for ending the ‘loudness war’ – http://dynamicrangeday.co.uk/

    Seems to me that demanding ‘better’ mastering should even have priority above demand for high res/def audio.
    There is not much sense in paying extra for a 24/192 files originated from a ‘ueberload’ master.

    N.B. I know that your files are ‘gently’ mastered AND high def!!!
    But shouldn’t we in general pay more attention to how this ridiculous ‘loudness war’ could be ended.

    I want ‘better’ mastering plus (at least) 24/96 quality files

    Reply
    • September 23, 2014 at 6:14 pm
      Permalink

      I’m in complete agreement with you on the mastering issue. But the sad thing is the labels aren’t going to change this…they demand that there artists be as loud as everyone else.

      The only mastering I do for my own productions is to establish the space between the tracks and the overall level. I never use any dynamics processing…not even gently.

      Reply
  • September 23, 2014 at 4:15 pm
    Permalink

    For me, the stereo mixes are the ones that I enjoy most. Surround sound mixes will be my next purchase.

    Reply
  • February 21, 2015 at 6:13 am
    Permalink

    “…available for the vinyl crowd and those of us that wish to avoid the further sonic degradation of analog transfers and the compromises of releasing on vinyl … I’m sure the mono versions are terrific and they are the “best that we can expect” from recordings made all those years ago but I personally would have a hard time listening in mono”.

    I suppose that this is the sort of commentary to be expected from one who regards 16-bit digital audio as merely ‘different’ to analogue rather than vastly and audibly inferior, but the comment regarding “mono” is a joke. This man shouldn’t be in charge of his own socks, let alone the recording of music…

    Reply
    • February 21, 2015 at 10:31 am
      Permalink

      Dave…you must be a major vinyl LP lover. To refuse to acknowledge the specifications of analog tape and vinyl LPs as being less capable than even CDs is very telling. My preference for better fidelity and stereo and multichannel can and should be able to coexist with your preference for analog. The recordings I’ve made exceed the fidelity of analog…you should give them a try.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

20 + thirteen =