Coming to Terminology: Defining Quality Not Sources
The discussion of high-resolution terminology requires a common set of terms, assumptions and basic concepts. It should really mean something
Read MoreThe discussion of high-resolution terminology requires a common set of terms, assumptions and basic concepts. It should really mean something
Read MoreWhat are we going to call audio that promises AND delivers better fidelity? Is it enough to say High Resolution
Read MoreIf I slather a gel over the surface of an optical disc or coat the edges of that same disc
Read MoreOn January 22, 2014, I posted an article about the efficacy of treating an optical disc with some sort of
Read MoreIf getting artists, engineers, producer and record labels to recognize the viability of high-resolution audio is proving to be a
Read MoreOne of my readers sent over a link to a Press Release written by mastering engineer Bob Katz that pronounced
Read MoreDespite the best efforts of many talented individuals and inspired companies, my heart of heart knows that high-resolution audio will
Read MoreI’ve posted a couple of times about my experiences at the recent NAMM Show and wanted to finish up with
Read MoreMy visit last Friday to the NAMM (National Association of Music Merchants) Convention in Anaheim included a stop at the
Read MoreThe emerging awareness of High Resolution Audio and its commercialization are headed for rough waters if the providers of “so-called”
Read More