{"id":2408,"date":"2014-02-05T11:14:33","date_gmt":"2014-02-05T19:14:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/?p=2408"},"modified":"2014-02-05T11:14:33","modified_gmt":"2014-02-05T19:14:33","slug":"coming-to-terminology-defining-quality-not-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/?p=2408","title":{"rendered":"Coming to Terminology: Defining Quality Not Sources"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The discussion of high-resolution terminology requires a common set of terms, assumptions and basic concepts. It should really mean something when you say something is high-resolution or ultra high-resolution (I saw that one yesterday associated with a release from Reference Recordings&#8230;a PCM recording released at 176.4 kHz\/24-bits). <\/p>\n<p>Over the course of 10 years or so, I&#8217;ve talked about high-resolution terminology and definitions with hundreds of people from audio engineers, to audiophiles and individuals from the consumer electronics companies. Thus far, I&#8217;ve been unable to get a consensus even among professional audio engineers. Unlike the working groups that found common ground on defining the various formats in video delivery (standard definition, high-definition and now ultra high-definition), music and audio engineers and other interested parties have not been able to establish meaningful and absolute definitions. This is a problem.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that the terminology has to be universal, convenient, simple and communicate the essential quality associated with a particular recording. Yesterday, I dismissed the &#8220;Studio Master&#8221; term embraced by some as being meaningless. Don&#8217;t we want the descriptive term or a logo to mean something qualitatively? I think so. And the term &#8220;Studio Master&#8221; doesn&#8217;t do that&#8230;it is more closely aligned with the provenance of a given recording; Unless you know the history of audio and the equipment and procedures that were employed in the production of individual projects, you can&#8217;t know what level of quality to expect with a generic term like &#8220;Studio Master&#8221;. There is value to this descriptive\/historical designation&#8230;I&#8217;ll come back to it tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p>Ideally, we want a term that helps us to identify the quality of the experience that we&#8217;re likely to have when listening to a track, not some reference to the output of the studio that mastered the recording. Additionally, we can&#8217;t rely on the specification numbers or the format to have any meaning with regards to fidelity. Just because something is delivered in a 384 kHz\/32-bit data bucket doesn&#8217;t mean that it meets the potential of a PCM recording of those specifications.<\/p>\n<p>So I start from a different place than most advocates for High-Resolution Audio. At the present time I believe there should be three quality designations and within them categories for both source and delivery formats and specifications. Here are the three major categories:<\/p>\n<p>High-Definition or High-Resolution &#8211; Recording and playback systems that have the potential to meet of exceed the capabilities of natural human hearing. New recordings done at 96 kHz\/24-bits or better with the intent to maximize fidelity.<\/p>\n<p>Standard-Definition or Standard Resolution &#8211; Recording and playback systems that have the potential to capture and reproduce a frequency range of 20 kHz and 60-90 dB of signal to noise ratio. Think analog tape, vinyl LPs and compact discs.<\/p>\n<p>Low-Definition or Low Resolution &#8211; Recording and playback systems that have the potential to capture and reproduce a frequency range of 15-18 kHz and 20-40 dB of signal to noise ratio. Here we\u2019ll have 128 kbps MP3, HD-Radio, AAC and other heavily compressed (data compression) formats.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m being very careful to describe the &#8220;potential&#8221; of each level&#8230;because it is possible to use an HD-Audio container to deliver a low-definition\/resolution recording. In fact, it happens all the time&#8230;most of the commercial recordings that are made available through iTunes fall into this category.<\/p>\n<p>An analogy would be the quality of a family 8mm movie shot back in the late 50s after it has been telecined to an ultra HD-Video format container. The quality of the source video is still that of the 50&#8217;s era film.<\/p>\n<p>We have to maintain the distinction between the potential fidelity of the source and the potential of the delivery format. It makes little sense to transfer a DSD 64 recording will all of its inherent &#8220;out of band&#8221; noise to a 192 kHz\/24-bit PCM file&#8230;although there are plenty of vendors doing exactly that.<\/p>\n<p>To be continued&#8230;  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The discussion of high-resolution terminology requires a common set of terms, assumptions and basic concepts. It should really mean something<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2410,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[83,172,57,87,17,119,82,70,26,42,227,169,276],"class_list":["post-2408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dr_aixs_posts","tag-analog-tape","tag-audio-resolution","tag-audio-specifications","tag-compact-discs","tag-dsd","tag-dsd-256","tag-dxd","tag-hd-downloads","tag-hd-audio","tag-high-resolution-audio","tag-hra","tag-mark-waldrep","tag-mastering"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2408"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2408\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2409,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2408\/revisions\/2409"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realhd-audio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}